On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 05:20:36PM +0200, rain_maker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Am Monday 03 May 2010 16:58:16 schrieben Sie: > > So I'm curious, how can you be sure that 148f:2573 is _always_ wrong > > for rt2500usb? I do acknowledge that the "73" part makes it suspicious... > But of course the problem in such cases is, you can't prove it, you can only > add more and more examples for "not being wrong" while finding one example > where actually a device with 148f:2573 working with rt2500usb und not working > with rt73usb would prove me wrong once and for all. http://osdir.com/ml/linux-wireless/2009-07/msg00267.html This seems to be such an example? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
