On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:04:33AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 12:59 +0200, Holger Schurig wrote: > > > I don't get your point. The patch I submitted fixes an Ooops in the > > > driver, due to wrong handling of an API. What does that have to do with > > > principle discussions about the frameworks in use? > > > > I asked if there is a better method, and you said that you would test a better > > solution. That means that someone else should make a better solution. > > > > I just pointed out that I won't be the one who creates the better solution, > > because for fundamental reasons I don't see the libertas+cfg80211 approach > > going forward. That issue has nothing to do with you or your patch, so please > > don't feel offended or confused. > > Fine; just rip out the mesh code and do the vanilla cfg80211 conversion > for infra & adhoc, and we'll add the mesh code back later. I don't have > time to do the cfg80211 bits, neither do the OLPC guys (AFAIK), so lets > take advantage of your willingness to do this and just move the driver > forward. Someone post a feature removal patch, please? John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
