Search Linux Wireless

Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 00/10] ANI for ath5k

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:27:57PM -0700, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On Friday 26 March 2010 06:13:11 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > - Improve beacon averaging algorithm for IBSS: Maybe we should keep
> > > > track of
> > > > 
> > > >  the average RSSI on a per-node basis and use the minimum of those in
> > > >  order not to loose far away nodes? The other option would be to limit
> > > >  the parameters we control similar to AP mode.
> > > 
> > > We have talked about this before. I thought that we agreed
> > > that adhoc nodes may
> > > 
> > >    a)be activated at any time
> > >    b)be positioned at an unknown distance apart
> > > 
> > > it therefore makes no sense to average the RSSI over the current nodes.
> > > If all the current nodes in the network are close by, the ani algorithm
> > > will wind the sensitivity down. Consequently, if a remote node is
> > > started, it will not be able to connect. Yet, the remote node should
> > > have been able to connect as the slot times etc were long enough,
> > > and the link budget is fine...
> 
> i'm not sure how big the effect of ANI is - would it really shut the remote 
> node out completely? or would just performance degrade? also beacons are sent 
> at the lowest rate, so they will travel far. this needs to be tested! it 
> doesnt make sense to discuss this based on hypothetical assumptions.
> 
> > > So yes, the only way to
> > > 
> > > > - Improve beacon averaging algorithm for IBSS:
> > > is to turn ani off. which means the issue you raised else where of
> > > providing reasonable userland controls (not via debugfs) becomes
> > > important.
> > 
> > If ANI helps IBSS so much then why not just default to turning it
> > off within the driver?
> 
> i would say in most standard cases, IBSS nodes are close together or at a 
> similar distance, so it does make sense to use ANI by default.
> 
> as well, we all agree that there should be userland controls. the questions is 
> just about the interface to use.

ANI is specific to Atheros cards so debugfs would do it. If we want to
have a more rigit API we could use a configfs entry for ath9k.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux