On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 12:09 +0100, ext-saravanan.dhanabal@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > In worst case it takes up to that much, though the average is less but still significant. > On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 11:31 -0400, Saravanan Dhanabal wrote: > > After last transmission, the device goes to sleep earlier > > than the configured dynamic power save timeout. If timeout > > is set to 400ms, device enters into sleep mode at around > > 330ms since from last TX. I still don't think I understand this patch. Why would you be interested in the exact timing rather than the time since the transmission? I mean ... why does it go to sleep _earlier_? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
