On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:03:06 +0100 florian@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi all! > > The first patch moves the rfkill sysfs ABI Documentation to Documentation/ABI > and deprecates the state and claim file. > > The second patch creates a replacement for the state file. Instead of exporting > some made-up state we just export the state of the 2 kill lines. > > The first patch should probably go into 2.6.34, as to warn users > (if there are any) early about this removal. > If there is no intent to remove the broken files, the feature-removal-schedule hunk > should probably be skipped. > > Cheers, > Flo > > p.s.: first discussion of this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/22/127 > Hi, sorry! I just realised that you already have the blocked_sw / blocked_hw one's queued. This just changes the name of blocked_sw and blocked_hw to "soft" and "hard". I don't know what you wanna do. I'm fine with blocked_hw and blocked_sw as it's referenced as such (hw/sw) in the code, but Marcel wanted to get away from the "hard blocked by hardware" notation, as it suggests that the transmitter could only be blocked by hardware... cheers, Flo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
