On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 16:20 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 02:21:14PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > Problem is that we enable QoS queues, when AP do not send us any QoS > > parameters. I think when AP not support QoS and does not tell anything > > about that, we should not enable QoS in H/W. I prepared a draft patch, > > it fixes the issue. However I'm not sure if this is right approach, > > perhaps we should find something better. > > I divide my fix into two patches. I'll send them in next emails. > If no one have objections I'll post them "officially" with -stable cc. I have objections. Or maybe not, but I don't think this makes a whole lot of sense since the BE queue should be programmed in the "qos turned off" way normally. That may be broken right now, but to me your patches seem like a workaround rather than a solution which would require an analysis of what's really going on. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
