On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 21:45 +0100, ext Kalle Valo wrote: > Juuso Oikarinen <juuso.oikarinen@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Instead of managing the TX security sequence number as two variables, use > > one 64 bit variable. This greatly simplifies the handling of the number. > > [...] > > > - u16 tx_security_seq_16; > > - u32 tx_security_seq_32; > > + s64 tx_security_seq; > > I'm curious, why s64 and not u64? I'm sure there's a good reason, I > just wasn't able figure it out. > Hi, good question. I don't remember the reasoning either. Good news is that we only need the first 48 bits, so it shouldn't matter so much. -Juuso -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
