On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 16:43 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Marcel, a question for you below. > > The question of Bluetooth coexistence pops up here, on IRC and on bug > reports quite too often so I've stuffed what I could onto a page with > a few references / code and about ath9k's schemes for BT coexistence, > feel free to extend or correct: <snip> > I do wonder if this could be useful to network applets like network > manager/connman. Not really. To me, it sounds like a "make it work" button. The kernel bits of Bluetooth should already have an idea of when a device is connected, so the kernel should be able to "do the right thing". Having options over what "the right thing" is is probably a good idea whilst the kinks are worked out from the default behaviour, but this is not something that should be advertised to users. > The other BT coex schemes are BT specific it seems > and not sure if those devices can expose that information out and > inform userspace of certain events. Cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
