Ok Next time, i will add sutatble cc's scripts/get_maintainer.pl. thanks..
Suitable cc's (from scripts/get_maintainer.pl) added.
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:55:31 +0900
_________<jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don___t work expected operation in __rfkill_set_sw_state.
when rfkill initialized. Rfkill___s blocked& unblocked is operating on the
contrary.
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung<jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/rfkill/core.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
index c224cb2..dcc2d38 100644
--- a/net/rfkill/core.c
+++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static void __rfkill_set_sw_state(struct rfkill
*rfkill, bool blocked)
if (rfkill->state& RFKILL_BLOCK_SW_SETCALL)
bit = RFKILL_BLOCK_SW_PREV;
- if (blocked)
+ if (!blocked)
rfkill->state |= bit;
else
rfkill->state&= ~bit;
Are you sure? What problems were you observing with the existing code?
Please fully describe your hardware and the driver's behaviour.
The current code _looks_ OK to me. If bool `blocked' is true, we set
the RFKILL_BLOCK_SW bit?
I implemented the wlan driver using rfkill.
In my source code, the wlan driver initalized to
RFKLL_USESR_STATE_UNBLOCKED..
if that is correct, maybe do working the unblocked...but not work
"unblocked"
below code is unblock's operation..right?
rfkill_init_sw_state(wlan, RFKILL_USER_STATE_UNBLOCKED);
but, do not operate unblocked.
please check that source code..
thanks for your comment, Andrew.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
