Search Linux Wireless

Re: [RFC] ath9k: Make AR_SREV_5416() macro evaluate to true for AR9100

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010-02-27 6:26 PM, Björn Smedman wrote:
> The AR_SREV_5416() macro evaluates to false for AR9100 while the
> definitions for AR_SREV_5416_20_OR_LATER() and
> AR_SREV_5416_22_OR_LATER() seem to assume AR9100 based chips fall
> under this category. For example the last line of
> 
> #define AR_SREV_5416_20_OR_LATER(_ah) \
>         (((AR_SREV_5416(_ah)) && \
>          ((_ah)->hw_version.macRev >= AR_SREV_REVISION_5416_20)) || \
>          ((_ah)->hw_version.macVersion >= AR_SREV_VERSION_9100))
> 
> makes no sense if AR_SREV_5416(_ah) is false when
> (_ah)->hw_version.macVersion == AR_SREV_VERSION_9100.
I think this is wrong. The AR_SREV_xxxx macros typically point to a
specific chip generation, whereas the AR_SREV_XXXX_OR_LATER() point to
the chip generation or any later.
AR9100 is related to AR9160, but not AR5416, so AR_SREV_5416() should
return false for 9100 based devices.
If you look at the AR_SREV_5416_20_OR_LATER macros, they do not assume
that AR_SREV_5416() evaluates to true for the
((_ah)->hw_version.macVersion >= AR_SREV_VERSION_9100) case, as it's
either (is 5416 && macRev >= 20) or macVersion > 9100

- Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux