Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > @@ -1240,7 +1228,7 @@ void ath9k_hw_deinit(struct ath_hw *ah)
> > {
> > struct ath_common *common = ath9k_hw_common(ah);
> >
> > - if (common->state <= ATH_HW_INITIALIZED)
> > + if (common->state < ATH_HW_INITIALIZED)
> > goto free_hw;
> >
> > if (!AR_SREV_9100(ah))
>
> There are some non-trivial parts like this one that could be submitted
> separately.
>
> > @@ -1249,10 +1237,8 @@ void ath9k_hw_deinit(struct ath_hw *ah)
> > ath9k_hw_setpower(ah, ATH9K_PM_FULL_SLEEP);
> >
> > free_hw:
> > - if (!AR_SREV_9280_10_OR_LATER(ah))
> > + if (!AR_SREV_9280_10_OR_LATER(ah) && !AR_SREV_9271(ah))
> > ath9k_hw_rf_free_ext_banks(ah);
> > - kfree(ah);
> > - ah = NULL;
>
> Another one. Actually, it is trivial, but not ath9k_htc related.
>
> It would be really nice to fast track the ath9k_htc driver to 2.6.34,
> but the changes affecting other devices should be separate, I believe.
I'll submit this fix as a separate patch.
Sujith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
