On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:11:22 +0100 Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Florian, > > blocked_[hs]w -> 0/1 makes IMO kind of sense. > > the kernel and /dev/rfkill just talks about "hard" and "soft" blocks. > > Don't confuse this with hardware and software. It seems were are keeping > to make this stupid semantical error over and over again. So everything > that says hardware, software, hw or sw in the API is bluntly wrong. > > Regards > > Marcel > Yes, ok. I agree that 'hardware block' for something 'out of the control of the driver' seems to be too narrow... Alright. How about blocked_soft and blocked_hard? cheers, Flo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
