On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 10:05 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Juuso Oikarinen >> <juuso.oikarinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > From: Teemu Paasikivi <ext-teemu.3.paasikivi@xxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Divided wl1271 driver to wl1271 "core" and wl1271_spi modules in >> preparation >> > of integration of the SDIO implementation. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Teemu Paasikivi <ext-teemu.3.paasikivi@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Reviewed-by: Juuso Oikarinen <juuso.oikarinen@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Signed-off-by: Juuso Oikarinen <juuso.oikarinen@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Which one is it, Reviewed or SOB? If both then just use SOB. > > I disagree. I think we should allow for people just sending on patches > (say as part of a company hierarchy) w/o giving them the careful review > the reviewed-by tag should imply. Technically I think that's right then, since the "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" does indeed not make mention to a technical anal review of the code, which for some reason I thought did. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
