On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 19:33 +0100, Gábor Stefanik wrote: > > IMHO a manufacturer would have to be immensely stupid to build an > N-PHY > > design based (!) chip that doesn't at least support MCS rates 0 > through > > 7, i.e. 1x1 11n operation. > > Well, check Atheros and Ralink for an example. Usually, such chips > aren't "built" on purpose, rather, they have 802.11n support disabled > due to having been found defective (but usable in 802.11g mode) during > manufacturing. That ... doesn't really make sense either. But we can leave it at that, I don't care much :) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
