On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 00:32 +0100, Benoit Papillault wrote: > This patch might have side effect which needs to be studied > > Signed-off-by: Benoit Papillault <benoit.papillault@xxxxxxx> > --- > net/mac80211/rx.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/mac80211/rx.c b/net/mac80211/rx.c > index 22ae6ee..f73fe9b 100644 > --- a/net/mac80211/rx.c > +++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c > @@ -923,6 +923,13 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_decrypt(struct ieee80211_rx_data > *rx) > rx->key = rcu_dereference(rx->sdata->keys[keyidx]); > > /* > + * Using WPA-NONE in IBSS, all frames, be it unicast or > + * multicast (including broadcast) are encrypted with the > + * same group key. In this case, we should not reset the key > + * to NULL > + */ > +#if 0 > + /* > * RSNA-protected unicast frames should always be sent with > * pairwise or station-to-station keys, but for WEP we allow > * using a key index as well. #if 0 is never a good idea, and that code is certainly needed. Don't send bad patches like this with [PATCH] tag please. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
