On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:25:40PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:19:54 -0500 > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:36:58AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:15:37 +0100 > >> > >> > It was intentional -- that sdev doesn't even have an irq member, but > >> > nobody ever noticed because of the wrong ifdef. > >> > >> Ok, then this needs to be explained in the commit message. > > > > OK...mind if I just revert the current version and ask Michael to > > resubmit with an appropriate changelog entry? > > Have you pulled this tree into others already? Why not > just pop out the commit and fix it's commit message, then > reapply? > > Having the revert commit in there is really stupid just for this. I have it pulled into wireless-next-2.6 to fix a merge conflict (from a latter commit). It is also pulled into wireless-testing but that is obviously less of an issue. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
