On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 11:51 -0800, Andrey Yurovsky wrote: > On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I do wonder though, the commit (155cc9e4b1d60161ee53) I referenced was > > yours, and now you're asking the same question as I am -- "why even > > allow adding stations?" > > It was supported for automated testing and experimentation (you could > then force certain topologies). I can't think of any other reason to > do it. I suppose that the same thing goes for mpaths and the mesh > portal tables. So would you prefer to fix it (however we would do that, I don't think that the patch here is correct since it leaves the station struct with no usable rates afaict), or just disallow it? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
