On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 22:02 +0800, Dunc wrote: > If applications set the QoS values, the who's to stop someone (for > example) writing a bittorrent client that marks all packets for the > highest priority as if they were VoIP or something? At this point all > the good work done in the applications is useless and the network > admin is going to have to not trust the QoS values and then attempt to > classify traffic by themselves, so it was all a waste of time. The QoS values an application sets can be viewed as "hints". It is still the network admin's choice to use it or not. For example, as a network admin for an Internet router, you don't want to trust any QoS values from ingress. But as a smart phone owner, you probably want to trust the applications running on it. For end users on noncritical devices, requiring them to do traffic mapping themselves is too much. IMO, having a way for the applications to specify the traffic priority they _wish_ to have is useful. Thanks, -yi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
