Search Linux Wireless

Re: Bug: 2.6.32 ath5k, associating with WEP128 AP is unreliable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/25/2010 11:39 AM, Bob Copeland wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Don Darling<darling.don@xxxxxxxxx>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm assuming this issue is related to the ath5k driver itself -- the
>>> network
>>> I'm using is only WEP128, and doesn't need wpa_supplicant.
>>
>> Huh, I didn't think any mac80211 driver supported WEP 128.  Are you sure
>> you
>> weren't using madwifi before?  Or maybe WEP 104?
>
> For the record, WEP104 and WEP128 are the same thing. The smaller number
> makes it explicit that the 24-bit IV is transmitted in the open. The same
> thing applies to WEP40 and WEP64.
>
> Larry
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

Only one problem there is another, nonstandard WEP type where the
actual key is 128-bit, and this is also sometimes referred to as
WEP128 (with the same metric as WEP64, this one would be WEP152). Same
goes for "WEP228/WEP256/WEP280".

-- 
Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux