On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 14:25 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > I think if this is required only for powersave, I don't think it necessarily is. The particular case where the problem surfaced now is power saving, but who knows what it may be used for. I kinda agree that 112.5% timeout is too small, but I don't think we should introduce too much variance into the process. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
