On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 01:41:58PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Jouni Malinen <j@xxxxx> wrote: > > By the way, that looks completely bogus.. Channel number cannot be used > > to figure out whether this is 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz band (e.g., channel 8 is > > used in both). This really should be based on the band the frame with > > the Country IE was received. > > This seems to me more like an issue with the spec. Doing it based on > the received band is obviously possible but what if the AP wants to > send out Country IE information for both channel 8 on 2 GHz and > channel 8 on 5 GHz? > I don't think the original Country IE design from IEEE Std 802.11d-2001 really supported such use, i.e., you can only describe the channels from your own band with that design. Have you really seen APs advertising channels from the other band in their Country IE? I would assume you could now use the Regulatory Extension mechanism to define another regulatory class and subband followed by channel triplets to do that. However, even in that case, the first triplets in the IE really needs to be for the band the frame is send on. Once the Regulatory Extension Identifier is used, further triplets should be interpreted differently. Anyway, I have no idea whether anyone really supports this extension (or can parse the standard to figure out how it would be used ;-).. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html