2010/1/6 Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wednesday 06 January 2010 16:40:32 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> +static void b43_nphy_stay_carrier_search(struct b43_wldev *dev, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + struct b43_phy *phy = &dev->phy;
>> + struct b43_phy_n *nphy = phy->n;
>> +
>> + if (enable) {
>> + u16 clip[] = { 0xFFFF, 0xFFFF };
>> + if (nphy->deaf_count++ == 0) {
>> + nphy->classifier_state = b43_nphy_classifier(dev, 0, 0);
>> + b43_nphy_classifier(dev, 0x7, 0);
>> + b43_nphy_read_clip_detection(dev, nphy->clip_state);
>> + b43_nphy_write_clip_detection(dev, clip);
>> + }
>> + b43_nphy_reset_cca(dev);
>> + } else {
>> + if (--nphy->deaf_count != 0) {
>
> If this test logic correct? The following would make more sense to me:
Huuh, thanks for catching that! I believe you saved me from long
debugging in future.
--
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
