On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 08:14 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez > <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> However, I don't quite understand why we need this function. We > already > >> tell cfg80211 about disconnect events or requests, can't it call > some > >> regulatory update when either of those two happen? > > > > Sure, hence the RFC, can you point me to those events? > > You mean the netlink ones we send to userspace? I mean the functions we call, like rx_deauth() etc. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
