W dniu 2 stycznia 2010 17:26 użytkownik Gábor Stefanik
<netrolller.3d@xxxxxxxxx> napisał:
> 2010/1/2 Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Finally I've possibility to test my Christmas-gift N-PHY :) b43 didn't
>> really "notice" it, so I needed to write this little patch. Now b43 at least
>> look for firmware for my card.
>>
>> Does this patch look OK?
>>
>> This time I post from Opera mail so I hope white-spaces will be fine.
>>
>> From 9b3ea4f29b038f732aba737323e2f89b275ce1ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:58:16 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] b43: Add new SSB's core id for BCM4328
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>
>> Following line shows my BCM4328 detected on SSB. We didn't include 0x0C rev.
>> ssb: Core 1 found: IEEE 802.11 (cc 0x812, rev 0x0C, vendor 0x4243)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
>> index 098dda1..3aa45b8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
>> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ static const struct ssb_device_id b43_ssb_tbl[] = {
>> SSB_DEVICE(SSB_VENDOR_BROADCOM, SSB_DEV_80211, 9),
>> SSB_DEVICE(SSB_VENDOR_BROADCOM, SSB_DEV_80211, 10),
>> SSB_DEVICE(SSB_VENDOR_BROADCOM, SSB_DEV_80211, 11),
>> + SSB_DEVICE(SSB_VENDOR_BROADCOM, SSB_DEV_80211, 12),
>
> Rev.14 is also missing (which AFAIK is used by some LP cards).
Thanks, I'll post patch for that as well. Is adding this 0x0C (==13)
fine in this form? Or maybe we should use ifdef CONFIG_B43_NPHY for
some reason?
--
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
