On 23.12.2009 12:43 海藻敬之 wrote: > 2. still not good and unstable throughput for 2.4Ghz > thanks to your patch[3/5], [4/5], throughput was improved pretty much > but still staying around 10~15Mbps(1hop), 1Mbps~6Mbps(2hops) That's strange, those patches can't change anything... They modify a code that cannot be used until patch[5/5] is applied, and even then you probably don't use it, because you didn't say you set the coverage class. I think there's something wrong with your test methodology, because I don't notice any difference, TCP throughput is always around 3MB/s. However I haven't tried ath5k on both ends yet. Have you tried setting a fixed rate (via iwconfig, it's not in iw yet)? Or setting a fixed antenna (there's no UI yet, you have to hardcode it, see function ath5k_hw_set_antenna_mode)? Lukas Turek
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
