Search Linux Wireless

Re: Revised wireless tree management practices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:59:29 +0100

> Hmmm, there are multiple ideas to investigate even within the current
> "merge window" policy.  Decoupling driver trees from core changes should
> certainly be possible (it works just fine in the storage area), some
> architectures make heavy use of topic branches to prevent 'monstermerge'
> issue etc.

I don't think seperating drivers out will help.

I'd say every 5 or core changes we get one that ends up touching some
API and a hand full of drivers.

And this also has implications for testing.  I want the most
active driver folks have to test their stuff against the core
changes as well.

This all happens automatically.

You can always tell git tools to just give you net/ changes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux