On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 14:29 -0800, David Miller wrote: >> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:52:51 +0900 (JST) >> >> > (cc to netdev) >> > >> > Hi net-folks >> > >> >> > [ ,A 561.323866] mtrr: type mismatch for e0000000,10000000 old: >> >> > write-back new: write-combining >> >> > [ 2688.500033] No probe response from AP 00:02:2d:08:51:2b after >> >> > 500ms, disconnecting. >> >> > [ 2689.580376] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:02:2d:08:51:2b (try 1) >> > >> > What's mean "No probe response"? Why its point waste 2000sec? >> >> I think you'll get more responses from the wireless list, >> replacing netdev with linux-wireless in the CC:... > > That is definitely done asynchronously, there's no reason it should > delay the resume. Yes, agree too. Please see my another reply. the darkness of screen make me post more kernel messages then needed. > > johannes > -- Regards dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
