On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 01:28 -0800, Zhu, Yi wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 06:35 +0800, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > 0x000000000001668e <iwl3945_rx_reply_tx+302>: lea 0x38(%r8),%rdi > > 0x0000000000016692 <iwl3945_rx_reply_tx+306>: lea 0x4f(%r8),%rax > > When this happened, from your previous post, r8 is 0x0 and rdi is 0x38. > Since "info" is %rdi (see below), this means > txq->txb[txq->q.read_ptr].skb[0], aka. r8 is 0. I agree with your conclusion here that r8 is 0 at this point. I am very confused how this can be since the two lines above the ones you pasted here are: 0x0000000000016683 <iwl3945_rx_reply_tx+291>:»mov (%rdx,%rax,1),%r8 0x0000000000016687 <iwl3945_rx_reply_tx+295>:»mov $0x0,%rdx >From the information in the post you refer to we have rdx as 0xffffffffa0c85f40 and rax as 0x4f. Since r8 is initialized above from these two registers ... how could it be that r8 ends up as zero? Reinette -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
