On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 18:29 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> In some situations it is required that a system be
> configured with no support for 40 MHz channels in
> the 2.4 GHz band. Rather than imposing any such
> restrictions on everybody, allow configuration a
> system like that with a module parameter. It is
> writable at runtime but only takes effect at the
> time of the next association.
That looks like a hack to me.
Maybe it should be treated like other CRDA flags? In fact, you can find
this in dbparse.py in the wireless-regdb sources:
# hole at bit 9. FIXME: Where is NO-HT40 defined?
'NO-HT40': 1<<10,
However, there are no other references to NO-HT40 in the wireless-regdb
or CRDA sources. I assume it's not implemented.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
