On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 13:47 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> The parsing of nl80211 seems to fail. If I find some time, I try to > >> look at it. > > > > Oh, that's not surprising, it's over two years old and after I started > > writing the C tool (iw) I never maintained the comments in nl80211.h > > that this tried to parse. > > Ok, good to know. What do you think if I remove the parsing of > nl80211.h and instead add the nl80211 commands manually as python > code? Sure, it's monkey code but easier to maintain IMHO. Yeah, I agree. > Or have some intermediate language, maybe. Any ideas? I guess we could use sparse to output introspection information for nl80211.h instead, but is it worth it? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
