On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 00:39 -0800, Joerg Pommnitz wrote: > Felix Fietkau wrote: > > At some point, I will try to come up with an implementation for > > ath9k which doesn't involve such voodoo, but instead compares > > the tx timestamp of some data packets against the rx timestamp > > of ack packets. > > Would this mean, that we could get per station ACK timeouts? > If so, this would be very useful in an IBSS network. In such an > environment one might talk to nodes whose distance to the sender > vary over a broad range. Not likely that _any_ hardware supports that, it'd have to modify the timers all the time. I suppose some firmware _could_ support it, but it's a huge complexity for extremely little gain. In any case, setting it to the max would be sufficient for this case, give it a thought :) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
