On 26.11.2009 20:25 Johannes Berg wrote: > My standard reference was obviously crap -- let's see, 7.3.2.9 is > better. Yes, I found the table. And now I also noticed the real difference: the slot time according to the standard rises in a step of three (which means ACK timeout will rise in a step of six). It's quite significant loss of precision, but it probably shouldn't make much difference in throughput. Anyway, this solutions would be good enough for us if it was accepted. So you propose to add parameter NL80211_ATTR_WIPHY_COVERAGE to nl80211 and functions set_coverage/get_coverage to cfg80211_ops? Lukas Turek
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
