On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Janakiram,
>
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/include/linux/rfkill.h b/include/linux/rfkill.h
>> >> index d787d5f..212f555 100644
>> >> --- a/include/linux/rfkill.h
>> >> +++ b/include/linux/rfkill.h
>> >> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>> >> * @RFKILL_TYPE_WIMAX: switch is on a WiMAX device.
>> >> * @RFKILL_TYPE_WWAN: switch is on a wireless WAN device.
>> >> * @RFKILL_TYPE_FM: switch is on a FM device.
>> >> + * @RFKILL_TYPE_GPS: switch is on a GPS device.
>> >> * @NUM_RFKILL_TYPES: number of defined rfkill types
>> >> */
>> >> enum rfkill_type {
>> >
>> > so this is getting stupid right now. I am sick of a really simple patch
>> > causes so much trouble. Even this one is wrong again. The GPS doc should
>> > obviously before FM.
>> Marcel I think you want me to submit GPS doc patch first.I will be
>> doing it shortly and then i will do it for FM.I am sorry for this mis
>> understanding
>
> I don't care in which order you submit the patches, but the order of the
> documentation should match the order in the enum. That is not a strict
> requirement, but here it makes total sense to do so.
>
> Also don't worry with the patches anymore. This took way too much ping
> pong to get it right, that I just wrote them by myself and submitted
> them for inclusion.
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>
>
>
I hope in that case i think it should be give signed off by both for
both the patches.
Regards,
Ram
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
