On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 15:04 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Tuesday 17 November 2009 14:46:25 Johannes Berg wrote: > > --- wireless-testing.orig/net/bridge/br_if.c 2009-11-17 14:19:17.000000000 +0100 > > +++ wireless-testing/net/bridge/br_if.c 2009-11-17 14:20:03.000000000 +0100 > > @@ -390,6 +390,10 @@ int br_add_if(struct net_bridge *br, str > > if (dev->br_port != NULL) > > return -EBUSY; > > > > + /* No bridging devices that dislike that (e.g. wireless) */ > > + if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_DONT_BRIDGE) > > + return -EINVAL; > > -EOPNOTSUPP? > That would probably produce a better error message in userspace. Good idea, will wait a bit for other comments and fix this when I send as [PATCH]. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part