On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 12:54 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: > > CONCLUSION: the AP doesn't like that. And the textual representation > > from tshark for this error as also confused about the roles of AP and > > station :-) > > The "AP doesn't like that" part seems correct. The textual > representation may be confusing, but it is correct. The AP behavior is > not. It's not really a confusing textual representation either ... if you consider that this code is supposed to be used only when the AP _requires_ short-slot from the station, and the station advertises not having it. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part