On Sunday 08 November 2009 16:05:33 Gertjan van Wingerde wrote: > On 11/08/09 15:48, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:25:58 Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > > >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c > >>> index 5c7d74a..3207b83 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c > >>> @@ -3,7 +3,13 @@ > >>> > >>> Based on the original rt2800pci.c and rt2800usb.c: > >>> > >>> - Copyright (C) 2004 - 2009 rt2x00 SourceForge Project > >>> + Copyright (C) 2009 Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> + Copyright (C) 2009 Alban Browaeys <prahal@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> + Copyright (C) 2009 Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> + Copyright (C) 2009 Luis Correia <luis.f.correia@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> + Copyright (C) 2009 Mattias Nissler <mattias.nissler@xxxxxx> > >>> + Copyright (C) 2009 Mark Asselstine <asselsm@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> + Copyright (C) 2009 Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> <http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com> > >>> > >>> This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > >> > >> If Bartlomiej has no objections, we could just update the statements for rt2800lib.c/rt2800lib.h > >> to something similar as rt2800.h: > >> > >> /* > >> Copyright (C) 2009 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > >> Copyright (C) 2009 Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Copyright (C) 2009 Alban Browaeys <prahal@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Copyright (C) 2009 Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Copyright (C) 2009 Luis Correia <luis.f.correia@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Copyright (C) 2009 Mattias Nissler <mattias.nissler@xxxxxx> > >> Copyright (C) 2009 Mark Asselstine <asselsm@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Copyright (C) 2009 Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > >> .... > >> > >> because not sure if we need the seperate "based on" comment.. But I'll let Bartlomiej > >> decide on this one. > > > > I think that the original version is correct and also documents new > > development direction well. > > > > To be honest I believe Ivo is right here. The current "based on" way of documenting copyright does seem to suggest that this list of people does not No, it does not: Copyright (C) 2009 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Based on the original rt2800pci.c and rt2800usb.c: Copyright (C) 2004 - 2009 rt2x00 SourceForge Project <http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com> and it is wasn't my idea to use rt2x00 project for copyrights in the original code. I did not do anything shady here -- this is the standard practice used in such situations (i.e. libata and I'm pretty sure changes were passed through Red Hat's lawyers). > have any copyright claims to the code in rt2800lib.c. This is not true, as the code is pure copies from their code that was previously in rt2800usb and The code is not "pure copies" from their code and they didn't have personal claims on the original code in the first place. You are trying to reverse the history now, just keep adding new claims as new patches from people flow in. I fail to see the real problem with it. -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
