On Sunday 08 November 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH] rt2800: add eFuse EEPROM support code to rt2800lib > > eFuse EEPROM is used also by USB chips (i.e. RT3070) > so move the needed code from rt2800pci to rt2800lib. > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h | 2 + > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c | 38 ++-------------------------- > drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h | 29 --------------------- > 5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > =================================================================== > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c > @@ -147,44 +147,12 @@ static void rt2800pci_read_eeprom_pci(st > > static int rt2800pci_efuse_detect(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev) > { > - u32 reg; > - > - rt2800_register_read(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_CTRL, ®); > - > - return rt2x00_get_field32(reg, EFUSE_CTRL_PRESENT); > + return rt2800_efuse_detect(rt2x00dev); > } It would be better to fix all calls to rt2800pci_efuse_detect to use rt2800_efuse_detect rather then adding a special wrapper function for it. > -static void rt2800pci_read_eeprom_efuse(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev) > +static inline void rt2800pci_read_eeprom_efuse(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev) > { > - unsigned int i; > - > - for (i = 0; i < EEPROM_SIZE / sizeof(u16); i += 8) > - rt2800pci_efuse_read(rt2x00dev, i); > + rt2800_read_eeprom_efuse(rt2x00dev); > } Same here. Ivo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html