On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 10:56:19PM -0800, Vasanth Thiagarajan wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:59:53AM +0530, Vasanth Thiagarajan wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 08:08:22PM +0530, Luis Rodriguez wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan > > > <vasanth@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 02:22:26AM +0530, Luis Rodriguez wrote: > > > >> The way idle configuration detection was implemented as > > > >> busted due to the fact that it assumed the ath9k virtual wiphy, > > > >> the aphy, would be marked as inactive if it was not used but > > > >> it turns out an aphy is always active if its the only wiphy > > > >> present. We need to distinguish between aphy activity and > > > >> idleness so we now add an idle bool for the aphy and mark > > > >> it as such based on the passed IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_IDLE > > > >> from mac80211. > > > >> > > > >> Previous to all_wiphys_idle would never be true when using > > > >> only one device so we never really were using > > > >> IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_IDLE -- we never turned the radio > > > >> off or on upon IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_IDLE changes as radio > > > >> changes depended on all_wiphys_idle being true either to > > > >> turn the radio on or off. Since it was always false for > > > >> one device this code was doing nothing. > > > >> > > > >> Reported-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> --- > > > >> > > > >> Vasanth, what do you think? > > > > > > > > Still we will have issue when bringing up a sec wiphy while the > > > > primary wiphy is in idle state. ath9k_start() does not brought up > > > > the newly created wiphy interface when the state of at least one > > > > previously created interface is in ACTIVE state. Unless already > > > > brought up interfaces are put down we hit this situation whenever > > > > we try to bring up a new secondary wiphy interface. So with this > > > > patch the actual h/w will remain radio disabled state even after > > > > a new interface is in active state. We need to bring the h/w into > > > > active state if all old interfaces are in idle state in > > > > ath9k_start(). > > > > > > I don't see what prevents a secondary virtual wiphy from getting the > > > radio started -- perhaps I'm missing something. When a virtual wiphy > > > needs to become non-idle that'll come from the mac80211 non-idle > > > config call and that will find that one device is non-idle and hence > > > start it. > > > > mac80211 will issue config() for non-idle only when the respective > > wiphy is already put into idle state. > > When testing the patch I did not see this issue. The patch works > fine. I'll debug it further to see why the issue I was expecting > did not show up, but now this patch looks fine. OK thanks for testing, I'll send in patch form. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
