Hi, On Thursday 29 October 2009 14:52:50 Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Bart, > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I'm saying that you should work with John to have him send a revert or > >> whatever to me. > > > > This is your responsibility to deal with your downstream maintainers, > > not mine and since you have accepted John's patch I'm asking you to > > revert rt2800pci patch from your tree. > > So why don't you just send a patch to fix it up? I see you're doing "git revert a9b3a9f" done. Dave, if you have problems with executing the command locally I'll be happy to supply you with the patch. > lots of cleanups to the staging drivers, why not direct some of that > energy to the drivers/net/wireless ones? When did we start to apply "fix it yourself" rule instead of "submitter should fix it" one to the _new_ code.. rt2800 drivers have their maintainers and I would like to know what they are doing besides complaining about users and staging tree.. -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
