On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 10:47 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 14:03 +0200, Holger Schurig wrote: > > > I don't see this happening that way -- how are you even getting > > to > > > __cfg80211_disconnected() if not through _send_deauth()? > > > > See step 7a in the second table. We got there via > > _send_deauth(). > > > > But later, step 3b in the second table (I kept the original > > numbers, so 3b happens after 7a time-wise!) we got into > > WARN_ON(). > > Still not making sense to me, since cfg80211_mlme_deauth() never does > anything after calling you. Ok, so I can see that this might happen as a result of a call to __cfg80211_disconnect(), and I think the patch is correct. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
