On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 01:31:44PM -0700, Kalle Valo wrote: > "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Devices with external radios have revisions which we can count on. > > On single chip solutions these EEPROM values for these radio revision > > also exist but are not meaningful as the radios are embedded onto the > > same chip. Each single-chip device evolves together as one device. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Changes hw_name to 60 bytes. > > Thanks, much better now. > > Another minor comment, sorry that I didn't notice it earlier: > > > +void ath9k_hw_name(struct ath_hw *ah, char *hw_name) > > +{ > > + /* chipsets >= AR9280 are single-chip */ > > + if (AR_SREV_9280_10_OR_LATER(ah)) { > > + sprintf(hw_name, > > + "Atheros single-chip AR%s Rev:%x", > > + ath9k_hw_mac_bb_name(ah->hw_version.macVersion), > > + ah->hw_version.macRev); > > + } > > + else { > > + sprintf(hw_name, > > + "Atheros AR%s MAC/BB Rev:%x AR%s RF Rev:%x: ", > > + ath9k_hw_mac_bb_name(ah->hw_version.macVersion), > > + ah->hw_version.macRev, > > + ath9k_hw_rf_name((ah->hw_version.analog5GhzRev & > > + AR_RADIO_SREV_MAJOR)), > > + ah->hw_version.phyRev); > > + } > > +} > > I think you should provide the size of hw_name to this function and > use snprintf() to avoid writing out of bounds. I was going to do this but since I know the users of it and control it seemed to not matter. I'll respin with this added, better to be careful. Thanks for the review. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html