-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Johannes Berg schrieb: > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 23:39 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > >> I'm not sure I can understand your question. This patch is mainly to >> avoid using netif_rx()/netif_rx_ni() pair as a test of proper process >> context handling; IMHO there're better tools for this (lockdep, >> WARN_ON's). > > I'm saying that it seems to me, as indicated by the API (and without > proof otherwise that's how it is) the networking layer needs to have > packets handed to it with softirqs disabled. Strange. Then what are the two separate functions netif_rx() and netif_rx_ni() for? > This really should be obvious. You're fixing the warning at the source > of the warning, rather than the source of the problem. Good idea. So please do tell us where the source of the problem is. Thanks, Tilman - -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@xxxxxxx Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFK4cALQ3+did9BuFsRAnW8AKCP4ey+gT2RZBYpzx91PaXd11A/PwCgh35g fhEbJs++1BRIQ3encV8fIm4= =SSaA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
