On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 04:35:28PM -0700, Luis Rodriguez wrote:
> > > --- a/net/mac80211/mlme.c
> > > +++ b/net/mac80211/mlme.c
> > > @@ -1463,11 +1463,11 @@ ieee80211_rx_mgmt_assoc_resp(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> > > if (status_code != WLAN_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> > > printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: AP denied association (code=%d)\n",
> > > sdata->dev->name, status_code);
> > > list_del(&wk->list);
> > > kfree(wk);
> > > - return RX_MGMT_CFG80211_ASSOC;
> > > + return RX_MGMT_CFG80211_DEAUTH;
> >
> > I'm sure this is correct. Maybe cfg80211 doesn't react properly to
> > getting an assoc frame with non-zero status?
>
> I see, will have to take a look when I get a chance then, not now though.
Actually can you elaborate a little on the logic here as to why
we want to issue an association command with non-zero status to
cfg80211 instead of just knocking off the current authentication
and killing the BSS?
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
