On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 16:28, Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@xxxxxx> wrote: > Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> - * Calls to this function and ieee80211_rx() may not be mixed for a >>> - * single hardware. >>> + * Calls to this function, ieee80211_rx() or ieee80211_rx_ni() may not >>> + * be mixed for a single hardware. >> >> You missed out ieee80211_rx_irqsafe() here. > > Here "this function" refer to ieee80211_rx_irqsafe(). But I can also > write it like this: > > Calls to ieee80211_rx_irqsafe(), ieee80211_rx() or ieee80211_rx_ni() > may not be mixed for a single hardware. > > Is that any better? Smacks self upside the head. This is what I get for commenting on patches in the morning. Sorry for the noise. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
