On Sunday 11 October 2009 12:31:06 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 12:26 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Sunday 11 October 2009 12:19:21 Johannes Berg wrote: > > > Due to the way it interacts with the networking > > > stack and other parts of mac80211, ieee80211_rx() > > > must be called with disabled softirqs. > > > > Is this stated in the documentation somewhere? > > No. However, there are many things that aren't in the documentation, I'm > working on a patch to add a note. Ok, thanks a lot. > I just wanted to provide a > rationale for me fixing this bug instead of you. Since when do we require that in commit messages? > If you disagree that > this is an accurate representation, I invite you to summarise the thread > that caused this miserable situation of a known bug not being fixed for > a very long time despite appropriate fixes being known in your own words > for the commit message. If you'd care _that_ much, you could have just reverted my commit. Yes, I introduced the regression and I was unable to cook up a fix for it. So the logical reaction to that would be to revert my commit. -- Greetings, Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
