On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:56 -0600, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:07 PM, John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I don't predict a huge problem if there are > > valid extensions required for use by wireless drivers in the future. > > But for now, I'd like to see us make use of some of the debugging > > facilities available in the ethtool API -- hopefully the iwlwifi guys > > are listening... ;-) > > Does the same apply to wimax then? Ethtool for 802.11 and wimax? Eh. Not really -- WiMAX is not eth-frame based, but IP based. The WiMAX stack doesn't require any type of framing/network device typing requirement. That is left up to the device driver writer (although yes, emulating eth is easier). -- -- Inaky -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
