On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 17:47 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > I agree with Michael. The bug is real and I have verified that > Michael's patch fixes the issue. Better to apply the patch now, it's > trivial to change the implementation if/when the network stack has > support for this. FWIW, I think in mac80211 the in_interrupt() check can never return true since we postpone all RX to the tasklet. But the tasklet seems to be ok -- so should it really be in_interrupt()? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
