>
> Sure!
> Very soon will do
>
So I didn't do the testing that soon...
Got swamped by many bugs present in ubuntu 9.10.
Now I have attempted same patch on top of wpa_supplicant, and it works.
diff --git a/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.c b/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.c
index 37a1927..a0098b9 100644
--- a/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.c
+++ b/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.c
@@ -1302,8 +1302,10 @@ void wpa_supplicant_disassociate(struct wpa_supplicant *wpa_s,
if (!is_zero_ether_addr(wpa_s->bssid)) {
if (wpa_s->drv_flags & WPA_DRIVER_FLAGS_USER_SPACE_MLME)
ieee80211_sta_disassociate(wpa_s, reason_code);
- else
+ else {
wpa_drv_disassociate(wpa_s, wpa_s->bssid, reason_code);
+ wpa_drv_deauthenticate(wpa_s, wpa_s->bssid, reason_code);
+ }
addr = wpa_s->bssid;
}
wpa_clear_keys(wpa_s, addr);
Would that be enough, or this is too hacky, and we need to audit each callsite of wpa_supplicant_disassociate
and see if we need to send deauth frame too?
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
