Search Linux Wireless

Re[6]: cfg80211 and rfkill_backport question.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Luis!

Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 4:17:40 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> They don't have to be exported and inlined, its one or the other. So
Yes, that's what I supposed.
> just ensure you your symbols you have conflicts with as
> EXPORT_SYMBOL() or defined in a header file as inline. You will
> obviously also need the header declaration if defined as an
> EXPORT_SYMBOL.
>From what I checked it all looks fine to me, except that there is
a circular dependency between cfg80211 and rfkill_backport (which
is confirmed by nm output I suppose). Is this circular dependency
intentional? Or, could it be avoided? (My understanding was that
as module loader loads one file at a time, it just have no way
to resolve such symbols, maybe I'm wrong on this)

Nikolai

>   Luis


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux