On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 02:45 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Reinette Chatre > <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Daniel Halperin pointed out that the naming > > here is rather inconsistent with at least 3 > > different names being used for one thing in > > different contexts. Rename the struct to > > iwl_ht_config (rather than iwl_ht_info) and > > use ht_conf as a variable for it. > > Hmm. ht_info was used to describe protocol handshake info (as > described by spec) while ht_configis actual HW configuration > constrained by HW capabilities or current state I didn't follow > closely current changes but at least they used to be not the same > things. Umm ... what am I supposed to read out of this comment? The code before this patch intermingled info and config (i.e. HW config and protocol config) and we're trying to clean that up. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
